To my mind, Brokeback Mountain (2005, Ang Lee) is a landmark film, a film that utterly deconstructs the “cowboy” (hypermasculine, patriarchal, phallocentric) ideology, while also revealing how horribly destructive such normalizing ideologies as hypermasculinity, patriarchy, heteronormativity, and Christianity/Protestantism are to identity.
(As an aside, I just have to throw in here that in my view Brokeback Mountain not getting the Academy Award for “Best Picture” was one of the worst, if the not the worst, travesty in Academy Award history!)
Opening Moments Already Giving Us a Tragic Ennis
The opening moments of the film speak volumes about Ennis (Heath Ledger). The long shots (revealing the vast open spaces), the lack of virtually any human bodies but Ennis, the cowboy-hypermasculine motif already apparent (in terms of setting, dress, posturing, etc.), all point to (A) the solitary nature of Ennis (just as a signifier, the shots of Ennis alone in these vast open spaces speak to his isolated nature, e.g., alone in the world) and (B) the hypermasculine “masquerade” these men inhabit. Moreover, for Ennis in particular, to my mind the more tragic of the two because of his past and economic hardships and inability to negotiate his hypermasculinity, his isolation (and smallness, in literal terms and in terms of his spatial presence in these early shots in the frame) highlights the pain of his existence. (And then the way that he seems to somehow use his body to express his interior turmoil by almost — somehow — pull his body into itself, if that makes any sense, which, also, by the way, testifies to what a remarkable performance by Heath Ledger this performance is…what a tragic loss.) And then Ennis’s face blocked by the placement of his hat and head down also speaks to another related observation here: In that same provocative shot, Ennis is placed to the side of the frame and against the side of the trailer office, his washed out colors blending in with his surroundings, all of which speak to a man who attempts to hide from the world, blend in with his surroundings, to not be the center of attention. It is almost as if he wants to not be seen! Accentuating all of this is the silence that seems to permeate these opening moments, silence speaking to this feeling of isolation and solitude of Ennis. We especially see this when Jack (Jake Gyllenhaal) pulls up and seems to want to engage with Ennis in talk, but Ennis, ever the anti-social being, tilts his head down in a pose that, again, emphasizes his desire to withdraw into himself in a mode of solitude and isolation and to keep people at a distance. Even when he goes inside the trailer office, Jack moves to the center of the frame and Ennis immediately slides to the side wall of the trailer park.
Brokeback Mountain
When Ennis and Jack begin their sheep herding and camp tender work, Ang Lee makes a point to emphasize the natural beauty and sublimity of their environment. In addition, the film’s recurring score during these moments suggest a tenderness and lyrical quality to these moments. In my view, with these sublime nature moments and the music, Lee wants to emphasize that Jack and Ennis’ love and desire is “natural,” beautiful, harmonious, poetic, sublime. In terms of the “natural” part of this equation, nature here is coded as that which is non-ideological, where Jack and Ennis can be themselves free from the hypermasculine, patriarchal, heteronormative, Christian ideological norms that define them in society. In this way, nature allows them to slowly but surely free themselves from the ideological chains that determine their way of being. Once they free themselves from this preconditioned state of being, they can interact with joy and exuberance and a kind of freedom they can find no where else. That their love and desire for each other occurs in this element speaks to the naturalness of their feelings, and it does feel as if after that first encounter it is as if they shed all of their guardedness, all of the defenses they put up to guard against any perception of this most forbidden of desires.
The Mating Dance
In the same way that nature symbolically represents the naturalness of their love and desire, Lee shows us how two people fall in love – the mating dance beginning with trivial, every day matters and conversations – no matter their gender. In the course of these everyday activities and experiences – some, like the bear encounter, not quite so “everyday” (!) – these two men bond and slowly but surely get closer to each other, culminating with enough trust for Ennis to finally open up to Jack, which, in turn, paves the way for further intimacy. Another point is important here: For the audience too, Lee needs to establish these men as typical, get us to relate to them, which, in turn, helps us better sympathize with what they are going through, a crucial, crucial thing for those spectators who have such a difficult time with same sex relationships, especially between men.
“March off to Hell”
First (Aggressive) Sex
Ennis and Jack’s first sexual encounter is almost violent in nature, almost as if even in intimacy, they must keep their guard up, can’t be anything but hypermasculine, especially Ennis, who is especially guarded in keeping his gayness hidden and suppressed. That is, their first aggressive encounter is an incredibly complex moment because it speaks to a hypermasculine conditioning. If watched closely, this moment is all about Ennis coming to terms with his nature. It is almost as if we are seeing Ennis’s interior psychological struggle physically manifested: In this life changing moment for him, he is literally torn into two, between the hypermasculine conditioning that needs to resist what he wants to do and his natural desires seeking release from his tormented state of being. At first, he does resist but his natural inclinations and desires finally win out but, again, not easily, manifested in a way that I think of as a first step: He can only be intimate in the most non-intimate way possible, through a kind of hypermasculine sexual intimacy, what I think of as a kind of initial compromise for his fragile state of mind, yes, doing it but doing it with as little actual contact or emotional intimacy as possible, somehow him (in his mind) keeping his masculinity intact even while he knows (in societal terms that is) he is not!
The Sheep Slaughtered by the Coyotes (Predators)
In a striking image, the morning after Ennis and Jack have consummated their relationship, Ennis finds that coyotes have slaughtered one of the sheep he was supposed to have been protecting. This moment and especially the image of the slaughtered sheep just resonates with so much meaning. First, Ennis’s feelings of guilt over the slaughtered sheep are written all over his face. Because he is lax in his duty to watch over the sheep, one is preyed on by coyotes. His guilt is hyper-accentuated because of why he was lax, due to spending the night with Jack. Of course, his ostensible guilt is magnified enormously by his guilt over having sex with Jack, having sex with a man, all of those ideological oppressive norms (e.g., religious, heteronormative, hypermasculine) weighing heavily on Ennis in this symptomatic moment. I’ve also always associated this image of the slaughtered and devoured sheep with that horrible image of the castrated man (Earl) that Ennis is forced to view, the suggestion seeming to be that because of this door that Ennis has walked through he is the sheep/Earl that will be devoured by the hypermasculine predators constantly lying in wait for him, not unlike how the “wolves” metaphor is used in many narratives (e.g., Little Red Riding Hood, The Three Little Pigs, The Shining, etc.).
“You Know I Ain’t Queer”
A little later, Ennis makes it clear to Jack that he isn’t “queer” and that their sexual relationship is a “one time thing,” a declaration that both reconciles in Ennis’s mind his straying from heteronormativity and allows him to bracket this moment in time as an exception to his normative (heterosexual, hypermasculine) state of being.
Aquirre Watching Them
Chilean Sheep
The symbolism here is just too perfect, the mixing of the implicitly coded “American” sheep with Chilean/Other sheep suggesting in general a contamination” of the “pure” with the Other, or, in the ideological terms of the film, homosexuality “contaminating” the “purity” of heteronormativity, Christianity/Protestantism, and especially — because the “contaminating” Others are “cowboys” — patriarchy, phallocentrism, and hypermasculinity, though, interestingly, with that long shot of all of the sheep and how they all look the same, we get the follow through or deconstructive element of this metaphor, where these “pure” ideologies are seen for what they are, purely arbitrary constructs that are ultimately meaningless.
By the way, I should note a kind of contrary metaphor here. Sheep in general represent conformity and passivity (e.g., representing ideological controls and conditioning), so, in this context, Ennis and Jack could be seen as “sheep” initially but in their break from ideological norms, they also break from the conformity of patriarchal, hypermasculine, heteronormative, and religious norms.
Ennis’s Agitation and Violent Outburst
This moment speaks to Ennis thinking that this is the last moment he can be his authentic self ever again, just a shattering sense of self. Jack will go back to being Jack, seeking out hook-ups with other men where he can, but Ennis must squarely go back in the closet and live his life as a lie. In this way, he has to resurrect his outer shell of hypermasculinity. To be tender and loving and affectionate with Jack at this point is too much for him; as he is about to re-enter the real world of hypermasculinity and heteronormativity, and to his ineluctable marriage to Alma, he must begin to re-enact those barriers around his heart and mind, to put his desire and emotions back in the box of his repressed state of being once again. Aggression does that, distances himself from Jack, as well as let him transfer loving emotions into negative emotions and vent his interior rage at this loss of self.
Compounding this fundamental element is just the fact that Ennis has fallen in love with Jack, found his “soul mate.” In this context too, Ennis must harden his heart. Here again, the best way to do that is to lash out at Jack’s attempt to be playful, turning a potential heart break into a different kind of pain, a physical pain and a numbing over the feeling of loss with anger and aggression.
Ennis’s Class Status Adding to His Feelings of Emasculation
Jack seems relatively happy and healthy in his “lie,” in part because he accepts his gayness and stridently works toward fulfilling his desire, but also because his financial security gives him at least some sense of self-worth at home, especially considering that apparently he isn’t just living on his wife’s money but is one of their best “salesman.” In other words, Jack has a relatively intact sense of masculinity, because he doesn’t have that shattering sense of shame that is attached to his homosexuality but also because he has the alternative means of feeling good about himself, his sense of himself as a good provider to his family. Contrarily, Ennis is the exact opposite in every way, his constant self-emasculation due to the shame he feels and the constant anxiety of being discovered. Moreover, due to his “failure” of being what society demands of a man, a good provider to his family, he feels emasculated doubly over. We especially get this in the scene where Alma tells him that she would have more of his kids if he could “support ’em.”
The REAL American Icon???
I just love that shot of Ennis set against the fourth of July fireworks, the quintessential American holiday. To my mind, this image of Ennis set against the fireworks exploding behind him and Alma set at distance from him, looking terrified of this enraged Ennis, invokes a couple of readings, including a tantalizing possible inversion:
If one were to cut out these images of Ennis set against the firework display – take this image out of context – I would argue that one would read this image positively, as associating Ennis with America, with what it stands for, especially as he seems to be signified as a “cowboy,” which of course registers all sorts or American ideologies, e.g., rugged individualism, an all American (hyper) masculinity, manifest destiny, extraordinary courage and heroism, and so on. Of course, that Ennis is gay or bisexual undercuts his embodiment of being a “cowboy,” which then, in turn, makes the meaning of this image of Ennis set against the fireworks not what it seems, creating a complex blend of signifiers.
That is, that’s what this film subverts, all of that, and it does so in this one culminating moment: It isn’t this historical “cowboy” that is the quintessential essence of what it means to be “American,” it is Ennis, the wholly dysfunctional Other! In other words, it is Otherness that defines the “norm” of what it means to be “American,” and, really, if we think about it, it isn’t just that Ennis is gay and dysfunctional, it is also his positive virtues such as the fortitude to live life as a closeted gay man and the courage to overcome a childhood of ingraining in him so much self-hate and self-loathing, but against all odds still pursue a relationship with Jack. That is what it means to be “American”: So many of us are Other in so many ways, which means we too must struggle against so much adversity set against us by so many indoctrinating ideologies.
In terms of Ennis being dysfunctional, Alma’s look of fear of Ennis’s rage and her distance from him speaks to another complex element in this moment and image. Ennis’s rage becomes a marker of something deep inside of him, his inability to determine himself and live his life according to how he wants to, his inexorable self-hatred and shame at what he is and his anger at feeling this way about himself, the pent up anger at having to project a lie to the world and keep suppressing his emotions, all of his emotions, his anger and fear, yes, but also his desire to love and be tender and sensitive. He also must live with his ever festering anger at a father who forced him to feel this fear and his self-loathing and shame. All of this translates into a bundle of repressed rage, unleashed when his control mechanisms crumble, as they are in this moment. When he rages, he is someone Alma does not recognize, someone Alma fears.
In this way, too, the film recognizes that Ennis’s dysfunctional state of repressed rage – released in this moment – is also quintessentially American, in that via its ideological norms (in this case, heteronormativity, hypermasculinity, phallocentrism, though it could be other norms such as religious beliefs, class status, gender norms, and so on), such modes of dysfunctional being — and the negative emotions (rage, resentment, etc.) that often accompanies such a state of being — are all too common. And I should also note here that this image of the hypermasculine “cowboy” is oppressive in general, as most men are subjected to trying to fulfill this (manly) image, to the detriment of their authentic self.
Jack and Ennis’s First Reunion
Despite the danger, Jack and Ennis are “helpless” to control their feelings and desires, they are so hungry for each other. In this way, we can see not only their intense desire and love for each other but also just how much they suppress during their times apart (and in this case they come together after thinking they’ll never see each other again!). In effect, Ang Lee is registering their very selfs in this moment, because it isn’t just their desires and feelings that they are suppressing but their very selfs, all of which erupts in a cascade of intensity that I suspect few can fully comprehend.
Jack’s Desired Fantasy Life and The Reality of Rich and Earl
A thread that begins on Brokeback Mountain and continues when Jack conveys his desired fantasy life to Ennis and then gets echoed at the end by Jack’s father is an under girding alternative desire by the spectator as well, this desire to create a scenario where Jack and Ennis can be together always and have a life together, free from the hate and persecution and fear from a society that won’t let them have this idyllic life. The reality that keeps them from even trying is perhaps the core center of this film, the story of the murder and castration of Earl. The deeper implication of Earl’s death is that the trauma of his brutal murder – and concomitant shame such a revelation brings – keeps Ennis from not only acting on such a dream but allowing himself to even see it as a dream, which, in turn, is what tears Ennis apart, the desire to fulfill his desire and the pushing back of this conditioned trauma that society has instilled in Ennis. And that’s why Jack is both a source of relief and an inadvertent source of shattering pain, because Jack activates this ripping-in-two of his psyche.
“King of the Road”
Thanksgiving Sequence
In this key sequence we especially see how this film is all about deconstructing stereotypical signifiers of hypermasculinity and patriarchy. In Jack’s case, Lureen’s father L.D. establishes his view of Jack – L.D. seems to instinctively sense something Other about Jack – by constantly emasculating him, e.g., not so subtly telling Jack – and Lureen – that he has little respect for him. The deeper implication here is how the film consciously sets these hypermasculine, patriarchal stereotypes up so as to purposely interrogate them, deconstruct them, highlight them as the arbitrary signifiers that they are. We get this with L.D. saying that a boy needs to watch football to be a man, which, in the context of this film’s deconstruction of hypermasculinity in general, we instantly interrogate and see as part of the ideological conditioning of boys-to-men, e.g., that boys don’t just innately become men but must go through various rituals, traditions, and trials to earn their masculinity, in the case of Jack’s son, watch football. In the case of Jack, who, again, is not seen as manly in the eyes of L.D. and Lureen herself, he must also earn his manhood, especially as he has already come to be seen as Other. This Otherness in him and how L. D. constantly degrades him causes Lureen to be ashamed of her husband, manliness being a key barometer of worth for men. In this moment, Jack takes back what was lost, re-instilling his position as “man of the house,” exerting his authority over his father-in-law, who, up until this moment had been the phallic male in even his (Jack’s) own household. Jack cutting the turkey at the end of this sequence becomes enormously symbolic in this regard, symbolic of his alpha male role in this moment, despite his Otherness, a potent deconstruction of the typical gay (unmanly) man stereotype.
Similarly, as I suggested above, it is crucial for both Ennis and Jack to have these moments where – ideologically (normatively) speaking – they can fulfill their sense of their phallic masculinity selves (as I say above, Ennis’s moment is when he stands up to the bikers). In this sense, by keeping these two in that hypermasculine territory, Lee is able to maintain the film’s subversive edge. Sad to say, if the film let these two fully slip from the “norm” of phallic masculinity, then hypermasculine men could more easily dismiss these two characters as not really being manly!
Alma’s Disclosure, Ennis’s Rage
As I suggest above, one of the crucial points this film makes is that these horribly oppressive phallocentric, hypermasculine, patriarchal ideologies don’t just oppress Ennis and Jack, but these ideologies oppress their loved ones as well, especially poor Alma. In effect, loved ones such as Alma are also victims of LGBTQ people who are forced to live a lie. In this context, then, Alma has had to live with the knowledge that not only did Ennis “cheat” on her with Jack (and perhaps the concurrent feelings attached to a heterosexual cheated-on mate who can’t but help to take it even more personally, because they feel that it was something lacking in themselves that drove their mate into the arms of a same sex lover) but that Ennis may very well have never truly loved her, was never truly invested in their relationship. And I’m sure this gnawed at Alma for the rest of her life, the growing understanding of a life wasted on a man who was never wholly there for her, the fact that she too had lived a lie. In this sense, then, I’m sure this moment had to happen for Alma, to let her cathartically release her own pent up angst, which, unfortunately, could only come out in a hateful, angry way, the only way she could translate her own hurt. In terms of Ennis’s reaction, there is so much written into this moment, certainly fear of what the consequences would be if his secret were found out (not just the threat to his life but the loss of all he holds dear), but, as I’ve conveyed above, there is some shame here as well. Often, when damaged people are cornered and forced to face the source of their pain – their conditioned sense of shame – they transfer that pain into anger and lash out.
And the lashing out at the stranger is him needing to exert his masculinity after being emasculated by Alma, though here too, I think Ennis is just a bundle of angst and suppressed rage at feelings he can’t even comprehend, again, his inability to be an authentic self. Alma’s ambush triggers not just his shame and fear but it triggers all that he keeps a lid on, what I convey above, the unfairness of his life, all the pain he feels for not being his authentic self, and with the rage from his shame and fear exploding to the surface, all of this comes exploding to the surface as well, Ennis just needing someone to cathartically release it on!
Back to Brokeback Mountain
Ennis’s Revealed Internal Torment
For me, one of the most painful moments in the film is this one, when Ennis reveals the depth of his oppressed state of being, e.g., he literally feels people know his secret and are staring at him. In this way, we can see just how successful hypermasculine, patriarchal, heteronormative, Christian ideologies are, in the sense that these ideologies have instilled in Ennis (and many LBGTQ people like him) — literally internalized in him — a self-regulating enforcement mechanism where other people or institutions are not even necessary to keep Ennis in line, his own interior shame and fear will do it for them.
Brokeback Mountain Again
“I wish I knew how to quit you”
Had Ennis never met Jack, then probably he would have gone on with his plan to marry Alma, have kids, get a steady job and live if not a happy life at least a contented life (or at least not an anguished life!), free of his released homosexual/bisexual desires. Jack opens a yawning door for him, exposing him to desires that he himself probably wasn’t even fully aware of he had suppressed them so deeply. In that release, unlike Jack, who can embrace his gay self, the best Ennis can do is allow himself a split existence, freeing his true self for their times at “Brokeback Mountain,” but then going back to his lie of a life in the “real” world. In this way, Ennis can not truly “be” (“nowhere,” “nothin’”), in the sense that in the “real” world, he can’t be who he is and as long as Jack/Brokeback Mountain exists for him, he can only “be” in those brief moments on “Brokeback Mountain,” leaving him in a continual state of indeterminacy, a VERY sad state of being indeed.
A Strange Flashback or Is It an Insert?
I’m not entirely sure what to make of this…flashback? It seems attached to Jack’s point of view at the end of the sequence so probably it is a flashback. However, it may also be an insert by Lee, which would make this moment even more interesting. If it is a flashback, it would seem to be Jack thinking back to their original moment on the real Brokeback Mountain (I’ve always read their latter nature excursions as not actually happening on Brokeback Mountain, them just calling these escapes to nature “Brokeback Mountain”), perhaps a thinking back to innocent times, when he could be contented living in the moment or hoping for a viable future with Ennis, though that the shot ends with Ennis leaving, perhaps it is just Jack thinking about how their relationship is based on Jack watching Ennis leave him again. More interesting is if this is an insert by Lee. If it is an insert, all of the above could still apply, though, since this is the last time that Jack and Ennis are together before Jack’s death, this moment is Lee’s commentary on the promise of Jack and Ennis in those touching early moments together, ending in unnecessary pain and suffering.
A Spurned Cassie and an Alone Ennis
As I suggest above, the Cassie thread I think is important because it punctuates Ennis’s “nothin’, nowhere” sentiment, where he seems to not care whether he develops a relationship with Cassie or not, the suggestion being that he only cares for Jack and can’t care for anyone else, or perhaps that because he always fears exposure (especially considering his traumatic experience with Alma’s revelation), he can only keep everyone else at a distance, making a close relationship impossible.
Jack’s Death
Due to his extreme traumatizing past (e.g., his father exposing him to the hate filled, violent image of the brutally murdered gay man Earl) and due to the conditioning that comes with being a “cowboy” (e.g., that a hypermasculine self is actualized at least in part through actually condoned and even expected acts of violence, especially against Others), Ennis essentially suffers from PTSD (posttraumatic stress disorder). We see this when he talks about his paranoia of people staring at him, as if they know what he is, and we see this with his over-the-top bursts of rage. And we see his PTSD in this scene, when his mind immediately goes to this image of Jack being violently killed because of his homosexuality. In this way, we see a man tragically suffering from the constant expectation of the violence that comes from being Other, a really tormented way of being. (Note: Like that previous seeming flashback I discuss above, these images of Jack being murdered are uncertain: Is this Ennis’s paranoia working overtime? Is it Ennis seeing through Lureen’s story to the truth of Jack’s death? Or is it even Lee inserting what really happened to Jack?)
Visiting Jack’s Parents
This moment when Ennis visits Jack’s parents gives us a fuller picture of Jack. To me, it was clear that both parents knew about Jack’s homosexuality/bisexuality, the mother apparently being more sympathetic to Jack’s sexual orientation unlike the seeming intolerance of the father. In this way, like Ennis’s father, Jack’s father represents the “superegos” of society (all of those oppressive ideologies) that instill in the Jacks and Ennises of the world that little voice in their head that they cannot be who they are. But more than that, the moment filled in some gaps, revealing Jack’s stripped down upbringing; the house itself and the interior space is just so bare, austere, colorless, speaking to the lack of emotion, love, nurturing in this household; and Jack’s room is so claustrophobically tiny and enclosing, emphasizing how oppressive his existence was growing up. Such signifiers explain Jack’s penchant for dreaming and his need for an “escape” from an oppressive existence (e.g. Jack had a harder time coping with his sacrificed lifestyle than Ennis). Interestingly, the only color in the home is Jack’s bloodied denim shirt in the closet that covers Ennis’ own bloodied shirt from their first summer on Brokeback Mountain, a signifier that adds a poignant ingredient here: In his differentness (Otherness), Jack was a vibrant (colorful) light in this deadened space of his oppressive (lifeless) parents and their oppressive (lifeless) ideologies. Another thought occurs to me: Put in the context of this household, the blood could also be a signifier of the violence done to him, beginning in this space.
The Closet Metaphor:
In the two ending sequences, we get two closets, two deeply symbolic closets. In Lee’s vision, the closet motif represents Jack and Ennis’s “hidden love” and the “pain” that comes with such a state of being, all embodied by the two shirts. In a sense, Lee uses this closet metaphor in a way that is a cliché, but he also turns this cliché into something quite profound, reflects the origin and why of this closet metaphor, the way that our intolerant ideologies force natural ways of being into hiding, a signifier of not only that which is forced to be hidden, but in its darkness and claustrophobic smallness, a signifier of oppression in general. In another sense, Lee kind of subverts the negative connotations of “closet” as well, in the sense that while the “closet” metaphor still signifies oppression, it also signifies a sacred space where Ennis and Jack can keep their cherished memories of at least moments where they could be free of the lie of their lives, e.g., be their “selfs” with the love of their lives.